London Vs Chicago (Size, Cost Of Living, Weather, Transportation, Jobs)

London and Chicago are two major cities that are widely recognized for their global influence in various fields such as finance, culture, and tourism.

While they may have some similarities, such as being home to some of the world’s most recognizable landmarks, they also have many differences that set them apart.

In this article, we will explore some of the key factors that differentiate London and Chicago, including their size, cost of living, weather, transportation, and jobs.

Whether you are planning to travel to one of these cities or are just interested in learning more about them, this article will provide you with valuable insights into the unique characteristics of London and Chicago.

Size: Which City Is Bigger?

When it comes to comparing the size of cities, there are several factors to consider, such as land area, population, and density. Here, we will take a closer look at London and Chicago, two major global cities, and explore which one is bigger in terms of these factors.

  • Land Area:

London has a total land area of 607 square miles, making it one of the largest cities in Europe. The city is divided into 33 boroughs, each with its own distinct character and attractions.

Some of the most popular boroughs include Westminster, Camden, and Kensington & Chelsea, which are home to famous landmarks such as Buckingham Palace, the British Museum, and Hyde Park.

In comparison, Chicago has a total land area of 234 square miles, making it significantly smaller than London.

However, despite its smaller size, Chicago is still a major city in the United States and is known for its iconic architecture, world-class museums, and vibrant neighborhoods.

  • Population:

London is one of the most populous cities in Europe, with a population of over 8.9 million people. It is a truly cosmopolitan city, with residents from all over the world, and is known for its diverse cultures and languages.

Chicago, on the other hand, has a population of over 2.7 million people, making it the third-largest city in the United States. The city is also a cultural melting pot, with a rich history of immigrants from various countries, including Poland, Mexico, and China.

  • Density:

Another factor to consider when comparing the size of cities is population density. London is known for its high population density, with an average of over 14,000 people per square mile.

This is partly due to the fact that London has a long history and has been continuously inhabited for over 2,000 years.

In contrast, Chicago has a lower population density, with an average of around 11,500 people per square mile. This is still quite high compared to many other cities in the United States, but it is lower than London’s density.

Cost Of Living: Which City Is More Affordable?

When considering a move to a new city, one of the most important factors to consider is the cost of living. Below, we will compare the cost of living in London and Chicago, two major global cities, and explore which one is more affordable.

  • Housing:

One of the biggest expenses for most people is housing. In London, the cost of living is notoriously high, especially when it comes to housing.

The average monthly rent for a one-bedroom apartment according to Numbeo in the city center is around £1,700, or roughly $2,200 USD. Outside of the city center, prices drop slightly to around £1,300, or $1,700 USD.

In Chicago, the cost of housing is generally more affordable than in London. The average monthly rent for a one-bedroom apartment according to Numbeo in the city center is around $1,400 USD, while outside of the city center, prices drop to around $1,100 USD.

  • Transportation:

Another factor to consider when comparing the cost of living is transportation. In London, the cost of public transportation can be quite high. A single ride on the tube costs around £2.40, or $3.10 USD, while a monthly pass costs around £135, or $175 USD.

In Chicago, public transportation is generally more affordable. A single ride on the CTA costs $2.50 USD, while a monthly pass costs $105 USD.

  • Food and Dining:

When it comes to dining out and groceries, the cost of living can vary significantly between London and Chicago. According to Numbeo, the cost of a meal for two at a mid-range restaurant in London is around £55, or $71 USD. In Chicago, the same meal would cost around $60 USD.

When it comes to groceries, the cost of living is generally higher in London. According to Numbeo, the average cost of groceries in London is around 20% higher than in Chicago.

Weather: Which City Has A Better Climate?

When it comes to climate, both London and Chicago experience distinct seasonal changes. Here, we will compare the weather in London and Chicago and explore which city has a better climate.

  • Temperature:

London has a temperate maritime climate, which means that it experiences mild temperatures throughout the year.

The summer months of June to August are generally the warmest, with temperatures averaging around 18-23°C (64-73°F). The winter months of December to February are generally the coldest, with temperatures averaging around 2-6°C (36-43°F).

Chicago has a humid continental climate, which means that it experiences hot and humid summers and cold winters.

The summer months of June to August are generally the warmest, with temperatures averaging around 21-28°C (70-82°F). The winter months of December to February are generally the coldest, with temperatures averaging around -6 to -1°C (21-30°F).

  • Precipitation:

London experiences a fair amount of rainfall throughout the year, with the wettest months being October and November. However, the city also experiences plenty of sunny days, especially during the summer months.

Chicago also experiences a fair amount of precipitation throughout the year, with the wettest months being May and June. The city is also known for its strong winds, especially during the winter months.

Transportation: Which City Is More Accessible?

Accessibility is a crucial factor when considering a city’s transportation system. Here, we will compare the transportation systems in London and Chicago and explore which city is more accessible.

  • Public Transportation:

London has an extensive public transportation system, including the iconic London Underground, buses, and trams. The city is known for its efficient and reliable transportation system, with frequent services and extensive coverage.

The London Underground, or the “Tube,” is one of the most extensive metro systems in the world, with 11 lines covering 402 kilometers (250 miles) and serving 270 stations. The bus network is also extensive, with over 8,500 buses covering 700 routes.

Chicago also has an extensive public transportation system, including the Chicago Transit Authority (CTA) buses and trains.

The CTA has eight “L” train lines and over 100 bus routes covering the city and surrounding suburbs. The trains and buses run frequently, with services operating 24 hours a day on some routes.

  • Accessibility for People with Disabilities:

Both London and Chicago are committed to ensuring accessibility for people with disabilities. The London Underground has step-free access at 78 stations, and all buses in London are accessible for wheelchair users.

The city also has a Dial-a-Ride service, which provides door-to-door transport for people with disabilities who cannot use public transportation.

Chicago has a similar commitment to accessibility, with all CTA buses and trains being wheelchair accessible. The city also has a Paratransit service, which provides door-to-door transportation for people with disabilities who cannot use the regular public transportation system.

  • Biking and Walking:

London has made significant investments in improving infrastructure for cyclists and pedestrians. The city has over 170 kilometers (105 miles) of cycle superhighways and over 9,000 Santander Cycles, a bike-sharing scheme.

Chicago has also made investments in improving biking and walking infrastructure. The city has over 300 kilometers (190 miles) of bike lanes and a bike-sharing program, Divvy.

Jobs: Which City Has Better Job Opportunities?

When considering a city to live in, job opportunities are a crucial factor to consider. Below, we will compare the job markets in London and Chicago and explore which city has better job opportunities.

  • Industries:

As the capital of the United Kingdom, London has a diverse and thriving job market. The city is home to several major international corporations and is a hub for the finance, technology, and creative industries.

The city also has a thriving startup scene, with several technology companies choosing to set up their headquarters in London.

Chicago is a major business and financial hub in the United States and has a diverse economy. The city has a strong manufacturing industry, with several major corporations, such as Boeing and Caterpillar, having their headquarters in the city.

Additionally, the city has a thriving technology sector, with many startups and established companies, such as Grubhub and Motorola Solutions, located in Chicago.

  • Job Growth and Career Advancement:

The job market in London is constantly evolving, with new industries emerging and existing industries adapting to meet changing demands.

The city’s diverse economy provides opportunities for job growth and career advancement across several industries, particularly in finance and technology.

Chicago has experienced steady job growth over the past few years, particularly in the technology and healthcare industries.

Additionally, the city’s strong manufacturing industry provides opportunities for job growth and career advancement in fields such as engineering and logistics.